We investigate the role of the entrepreneurial processes within SMEs operating within a well established supply chain operating under high innovation constraints. We specifically analyze the interaction effects between the recognition and evaluation and selection processes for innovations and their impact on firm performance. Our study provides insights into countervailing effects of innovation proactiveness and the rigidity of the innovation evaluation and selection processes.
Alertness is seen as a precondition for opportunity discovery (Gaglio & Katz; Kirzner 1999). Goal-setting theory stresses the need to specify overarching strategic goals to direct idea generation. We propose that these components jointly define innovation proactiveness and that both innovation alertness (H1) as well as innovation goals (H2) support firm performance. While alertness can expected to be more important to understanding the performance of small firms (H3), innovation goals should be more important for the performance of medium sized firms (H4).
The number of innovation ideas generated is related to firm success (Lawson, Samson 2001). But an increase of ideas could also cause an evaluation and selection problem requiring organization: Increased innovation proactiveness may thus lead to more alternative innovation proposals and require a more rigid evaluation&selection process. This may lead to missed or delayed innovation opportunities. The positive effects of innovation proactiveness on firm performance may thus be countervailed by negative effects of process rigidity (H5).
Teichert, Thorsten and Lechler, Thomas
"COUNTERVAILING EFFECTS OF INNOVATION PROACTIVENESS IN SMES (SUMMARY),"
Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research: Vol. 29
, Article 6.
Available at: http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol29/iss17/6